Understanding SC 2.4.12: Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced) (Level AAA)

In Brief

Goal

Don't cover any part of the item with focus.

What to do

Ensure when an item gets keyboard focus, it is fully visible.

Why it's important

People who can't use a mouse need to see what has keyboard focus.

Intent

The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that the item receiving keyboard focus is always visible in the user's viewport. For sighted people who rely on a keyboard (or on a device that operates through the keyboard interface, such as a switch or voice input), knowing the current point of focus is critical. The component with focus signals the interaction point on the page. Where users cannot see the item with focus, they may not know how to proceed, or may even think the system has become unresponsive.

Typical types of content that can overlap focused items are sticky footers, sticky headers, and non-modal dialogs. As a user tabs through the page, these layers of content can hide the item receiving focus, along with its focus indicator.

A notification implemented as sticky content, such as a cookie banner, will fail this Success Criterion if it partially covers a component receiving focus. Ways of passing include making the banner modal so the user has to dismiss the banner before navigating through the page, or using scroll padding so the banner does not overlap other content. Notifications that do not require user action could also meet this criterion by closing on loss of focus.

Another form of obscuring can occur where light boxes or other semi-opaque effects overlap the item with focus. This form of obscuring is not in scope for this Success Criterion. While less than 100 percent opacity is not causing the component to be visually hidden, such semi-opaque overlaps may cause a failure of 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast and/or 2.4.13 Focus Appearance. When a focus indicator can be covered by a semi-opaque component, the focus indicator should be assessed against 1.4.11 and 2.4.13. The intention in both situations is that the component receiving focus should never be obscured to the point a user cannot tell which item has focus.

Benefits

• Sighted users who rely on a keyboard interface to operate the page will be able to see the component which gets keyboard focus. Such users include those who rely on devices which use the keyboard interface, including speech input, sip-and-puff software, on-screen keyboards, scanning software, and a variety of assistive technologies and alternate keyboards.
• People with limited or low vision but who rely upon a pointing device (for viewport orientation and repositioning) benefit from a clearly visible indication of the current point of keyboard interaction, especially where magnification reduces the overall useable portion of content.
• People with attention limitations, short term memory limitations, or limitations in executive processes benefit by being able to more easily discover where the focus is located.

Examples

• A page has a sticky footer (attached to the bottom of the viewport). When tabbing down the page the focused item is not at all obscured by the footer because content in the viewport scrolls up to always display the item with keyboard focus using scroll padding.
• A page has a large (30% wide) cookie approval dialog. The dialog is modal, preventing access to the other controls in the page until it has been dismissed. Focus is not obscured because the cookie approval dialog (including the focus indicator) remains on screen until selections are made and submitted.
• A notification is implemented as a sticky header and the keyboard focus is moved to the notification. The notification disappears when it loses focus, and does not obscure any other controls (including the focus indicator visible prior to the notification).

Techniques

Each numbered item in this section represents a technique or combination of techniques that the WCAG Working Group deems sufficient for meeting this Success Criterion. A technique may go beyond the minimum requirement of the criterion. There may be other ways of meeting the criterion not covered by these techniques. For information on using other techniques, see Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria, particularly the "Other Techniques" section.